Homeless NYC Students See Record Absences and School Transfers as Test Scores Lag Behind

Homelessness among New York’s schoolchildren is silently undermining the city’s future workforce and resilience.

On any given morning in New York City, more than 154,000 public school students—a tally rivaling the population of Fort Lauderdale—awake in shelters, motels, or crowded apartments, unsure where they will rest that night. If these children comprised a single district, it would eclipse the size of those in San Francisco, Dallas, or Seattle, ranking among the largest in America. Instead, scattered throughout the city’s sprawling school system, they navigate an educational gauntlet for which few policymakers are prepared.

A new report from Advocates for Children of New York exposes the scale of the city’s crisis with quiet but devastating clarity. In the 2024–25 school year, roughly one in seven students lacked a permanent home—the highest figure ever recorded. Of these, children residing in shelters fared worst: some 63% were “chronically absent,” missing at least 10% of school days, compared with 27% among stably housed peers. Mobility compounded the chaos: one in five homeless students in shelters transferred schools at least once last year, compared to just one in 24 of their classmates for whom housing was assured.

The academic consequences land with predictable cruelty. A paltry 27% of homeless students in grades three through eight scored as “proficient” in state math and English exams—less than half the citywide average. For those lodged in shelters, classrooms too often become cold stations along a perpetual commute, not sites of stability or achievement.

These data would distress any city, but in New York they bode especially ill. The city’s ambitions—whether to remain a global financial capital or a haven for upward mobility—rely, as ever, on its public schools to mint a skilled, adaptable workforce. Yet today’s snapshot reveals a daunting pipeline problem: tens of thousands of students are being left academically adrift by conditions for which the Department of Education (DOE) was never designed.

For City Hall, the problem is rapidly becoming less abstract and more urgent. The surge in student homelessness is propelled both by a deepening local housing crisis and by flows of migrant families. Even with headline economic growth, tens of thousands of families cannot find or afford stable lodging. As Jennifer Pringle, director of Advocates for Children’s Learners in Temporary Housing Project, wryly noted, “Education is the best tool we have to prevent future homelessness, and only bold leadership from City Hall can bring the urgency and coordination needed.” The implication is plain: while efforts at affordability grind along, an entire cohort loses out on education’s promise as an escalator of social mobility.

Though Mayor Zohran Mamdani and schools chancellor Kamar Samuels reportedly express concern—and hold meetings with advocacy groups—the systemic response has yet to match the magnitude of the challenge. The city offers school-based social workers and transit assistance, but caseloads and funding often prove puny in the face of student need. The DOE, to its credit, has improved identification and enrollment practices for homeless students; less clear is whether these tweaks will reverse chronic absenteeism and academic underachievement.

Beyond the hallways, this uptrend in student homelessness portends awkward questions for New York’s future economic dynamism. Employers increasingly lament skill gaps and underprepared recruits; unless addressed, the city may find its next generation less equipped to fill those high-productivity roles on which tax coffers and cosmopolitan culture depend. The risk is cyclical: uneducated children facing adult homelessness, costing the civic purse even more.

A national problem with local flavour

New York is hardly alone in wrestling with student homelessness. The National Center for Homeless Education estimates more than 1.2 million American students experienced homelessness in 2023. Yet the proportions in Gotham are particularly acute, thanks to the city’s sky-high rents, shelter system strains, and immigrant inflows. Comparable urban districts such as Los Angeles and Chicago report daunting numbers, but none quite rivals New York’s absolute total. What the city endures today, other metros are likely to confront tomorrow as housing costs spiral.

Global capitals fare little better. London’s recent figures echo similar trends, with students in “temporary accommodation” lagging their peers in achievement and stability—albeit with a far more robust social safety net. Cities in the OECD are waking up to the fact that educational systems built for settled populations falter when confronted with mass transience and insecurity.

Some observers propose radical, and costly, treatments: dedicated “micro-schools” for the homeless, universal pre-K expansion, even housing stipends tied to academic performance. Modest improvements, though, require neither fresh blueprints nor vast new dollars. Prudent measures—expanded busing, more staff for school-family liaisons, tiled data-sharing between agencies—can dent absenteeism and enhance continuity for this population. Above all, political leaders must treat the matter as a systemic risk, not an isolated misfortune.

We reckon the stakes are stubbornly high, and the current approach—cautious, piecemeal, always teetering on the brink of neglect—is insufficient. The city cannot afford to treat a cohort larger than many municipalities as academic collateral damage. If the mayoral administration hopes to avoid the long-term costs of unaddressed educational disadvantage, more sweeping coordination and resource allocation would be wise, if not inevitable.

For a city that prides itself on absorbing the world’s strains and remaking its citizens anew, the true test may be whether New York can ensure that “Homeless Student” is not a synonym for “Forgotten New Yorker.” The city’s civic health, talent pool, and reputation for resilience will all be measured, in the end, by what becomes of these children.

■