Nor’easter Drops 22 Inches on Queens, City Halts, Streets and Schools Slow to Thaw

An unseasonably fierce nor’easter brings New York to a rare standstill, raising questions about how prepared the city remains for weather extremes and their knock-on effects.

At LaGuardia Airport, winds lashed runways and visibility plummeted; by Monday, gauges there measured nearly two feet of snow—more than New York City receives in a typical winter. Sometime before sundown on Sunday, Mayor Zohran Mamdani took to the airwaves, declaring a local state of emergency. For the first time in years, city streets fell eerily quiet: all non-essential vehicles banned, the city’s customary swirl replaced by banks of white and the soughing of wind at 55 miles per hour.

The nor’easter that struck New York this past weekend was a thorough disruptor. Over roughly 36 hours, it deposited an outsized 22 inches of snow, shut schools citywide, and effectively crippled the city’s mobility. Residents of Astoria found themselves entombed, unable to properly dig out even on Monday morning, the storm only relenting by afternoon. In a municipality that prides itself on weathering every storm—with bluster, determination and salt—this episode carried particular import.

New York’s response was, in certain respects, textbook. The mayor’s prompt declaration evidenced a willingness to prioritise safety over commerce, suspending alternate-side parking rules for the week and suspending schools at the first sign of trouble. Street ploughs and sanitation crews, veterans of old blizzards, were nonetheless outmatched—hindered by ongoing snow and wind, their own vehicles among the few visible on city roads.

The immediate economic implications, if puny on a quarterly earnings call, were not inconsiderable for city dwellers. Service and hospitality workers lost income as businesses shuttered; flights in and out of LaGuardia, Newark, and JFK—all gagged by weather—disrupted national and transatlantic itineraries. The shutdown of schools rippled through family routines, with working parents pressed to improvise or stay home.

Even as the city shovels itself out, larger questions loom. New York’s outsized density ensures that any significant transport or economic disruption multiplies rapidly: one snow day’s lost productivity can easily total tens of millions of dollars. On the heels of a pandemic that upended work, schooling, and city finances, even temporary paralysis undermines fragile recovery. For hourly and gig workers, these interruptions strain household balance sheets already thin with inflation. Street vendors and small shops, in particular, suffer most—burning through reserves to cover lost trade.

A climate of disruption

What is striking is not just the ferocity of a single nor’easter but the portents it holds. The city, in its long annals, has survived more brutal blizzards—the infamous “Blizzard of ‘96” comes to mind, which dumped even more snow. But weather volatility is on a troubling ascent: heavy snowfalls are no longer exceptional, nor are high winds or abrupt thaws. City officials must reckon with resilience planning beyond mere snow clearance: protecting the underground labyrinth of subways, safeguarding the housing stock—much of it antiquated—and assuring that emergency services reach those most vulnerable.

Every large snowstorm also lays bare inequalities, literal and figurative. Affluent districts see ploughs first; lower-income neighborhoods, including parts of Queens and the Bronx, languish under mounting drifts. Public transit shutdowns hit essential workers—often from these districts—hardest. The suspension of parking rules is a boon to some, but further gums up street mobility for others. Recovery, as ever in New York, is uneven.

Nationally, New York’s ordeal is a harbinger. American cities from Boston to Chicago face their own version of this relentless meteorological dice roll. Urban planners, many already awake to the problems of sea-level rise and flooding, must now pay more attention to the less spectacular but stubborn challenge of snow management. In Europe and East Asia, urban snow response systems (in Oslo or Sapporo, say) tend to run more smoothly, with hardened infrastructure and predictable routines. New York, for all its vaunted grit, shows its age and improvisational habits each time the skies darken.

There is, however, something peculiarly New York in the ordeal: neighbours shovelling each other’s walks, corner stores serving coffee to those braving the drifts, and the city’s essential machinery creaking back to life with groans and chutzpah. Technology—app-aided ride sharing, remote work, real-time snow alerts—does play a role in softening the blow. But it cannot yet substitute for robust public infrastructure or clear municipal foresight.

What, then, should New Yorkers—and their politicians—make of this late February reminder? The city’s underlying resilience remains formidable. But the storm highlighted gaps in preparation, the perennial underfunding of public works, and the fragility of low-income livelihoods in times of disruption. Budget debates this spring should weigh not just potholes and payrolls, but climate-adaptive investments and affordable backup systems (think: emergency childcare, distributed snow-melt experiments, and winterised transit).

If the storm’s economic impact is modest in the aggregate, the message is nonetheless clarion: in an era of climatic unpredictability, a metropolis can ill afford complacency. New Yorkers are unlikely to be cowed by snow. But enduring resilience will demand more than shovels and bravado—it will require forward-thinking policy, smarter spending, and, perhaps, a little humility before the elements.

■