Monday, August 25, 2025

Rip Current Warning Hits Brooklyn and Queens Beaches Through Sunday, Swimming Skills Optional

Updated August 23, 2025, 10:11am EDT · NEW YORK CITY


Rip Current Warning Hits Brooklyn and Queens Beaches Through Sunday, Swimming Skills Optional
PHOTOGRAPH: SILIVE.COM

Deadly, invisible hazards haunt New York’s shores — and the city’s rip current warnings expose persistent gaps in beach safety culture and systems.

On a muggy July weekend, as temperatures cracked 90°F and city folk flocked to the waves, the National Weather Service quietly issued a rip current statement: from 3:53 a.m. Saturday until Sunday at 8 p.m., waters off Brooklyn and Queens would be treacherous. The alert, easily swamped amid barbeque plans and subway delays, portends risks rarely headline-worthy — unless tragedy strikes. Yet these swift-moving channels routinely account for more American beach deaths than sharks, lightning, or hurricanes.

The warning itself is prosaic: “Always have a flotation device with you and swim near a lifeguard.” The guidance, repeated year after year, has the weariness of good advice too seldom heeded — and often dwarfed by the siren call of a cool surf. But the consequences are real and sobering. Despite New York’s robust parks system and a much-vaunted corps of lifeguards, its beaches remain fertile ground for disaster. As summer crowds surge past pre-pandemic levels, the city’s preparedness, mindset, and infrastructure are set to be tested once again.

Rip currents, as locals who have tangled with them can attest, are no mere undertow. They are fast-moving, narrow channels funneling water seaward at up to 8 feet per second. Even practiced swimmers may find themselves swept hundreds of feet from shore before fully grasping their predicament. The rip current, unlike the malevolent undertow of urban legend, usually does not pull one under — but panic and poor judgment frequently prove just as fatal.

More than a public service announcement

For New Yorkers, the implications are as swift as the currents themselves. Eight million residents, many with limited swimming skills and precious little aquatic training, gain access each season to the city’s 14 miles of public beaches. The Parks Department deploys some 1,400 lifeguards spanning Coney Island to Rockaway. Still, last year, multiple rescues and drownings marred the season, provoking fresh scrutiny. According to the United States Lifesaving Association, rip currents cause over 80% of rescues performed by surf beach lifeguards.

The latest alert may strike some as routine, yet it foreshadows a broader anxiety. Most city-goers — immigrants, tourists, and lifelong residents alike — regard the sea as a novelty, not a threat. Familiarity, here, breeds complacency. Many ignore (or misunderstand) posted warnings; others swim where no lifeguard patrols. The Parks Department requires strict lifeguard-to-swimmer ratios, but shortfalls in recruitment have become a chronic complaint, evidenced by abrupt beach closures on prime summer weekends.

Beneath the surface, second-order effects ripple outward. The city’s value proposition — vibrant, livable, safe — partly rests on public spaces like beaches, especially as oppressive summer weather makes parks and cooling centers essential for the unhoused and under-resourced. Accidents damage not only families but also civic trust in municipal competence. Legal claims arising from drownings, while rare, can cost millions and juice insurance rates for the cash-strapped Parks budget. Beyond litigation, each fatality stirs new scrutiny of city hiring, seasonal preparedness, and multilingual outreach.

Rip currents also test New York’s capacity to communicate risk. Current warnings rely on a mix of digital alerts, on-site signage, and lifeguard whistles — a patchwork system. United Robots, a machine-learning outfit contracted to disseminate National Weather Service bulletins, automates the alerts, but those least likely to read English news apps, or who are digital outsiders, often remain in the dark. The weather service, for its part, offers advice laced with realism: don’t panic, float, swim parallel to shore, call for help. Such advice is as solid as it is inaccessible if you cannot read the signs.

The politics of prevention

Inevitably, drownings become political. Calls for higher lifeguard pay, more imaginative recruitment, and investments in public swimming lessons echo each June. Yet the city’s efforts, though considerable in budgetary terms (more than $25 million earmarked for beach operations this year), have yielded mixed results. Elected officials and union spokesmen routinely trade blame for staffing gaps. It is not lost on critics that while municipal pools and playgrounds attract millions, swimming competence remains a patchy, often class-linked privilege.

Nationally, New York is hardly unique. California and Florida, which suffer order-of-magnitude more drownings annually, have begun trialling rip current detection buoys, drone surveillance of unguarded stretches, and texts sent directly to phones when ocean conditions turn perilous. Sydney’s Bondi Beach festoons its sand with rip warnings in a dozen languages and retrains guards annually on best-practice rescue. American lifeguard standards, however, remain inconsistent — as do investments in public swim lessons. The United States lags behind countries like Australia in aligning coastal leisure with rigorous aquatic education.

Culture, complacency, and the limits of signage

Relying on residents’ good sense and sporadic public messaging has predictable limits. In New York, expressions of official concern are welcome but not always effective. City agencies have little leverage over swimming habits on unguarded beaches (where most drownings occur), and “No Swimming” placards are easily ignored. The argument that enforcement is the answer founders on practicalities: It would require a puny army of officers to police every wave.

A more durable solution, as hard-headed analysts wager, lies in nudging culture itself. Mandating basic aquatic training in public schools, expanding multi-lingual outreach before high tide, and treating rip current fluency as seriously as fire-drill protocol — these are not quick fixes, but they are feasible. Technology may assist but cannot supplant sceptical, streetwise New York judgment: distrust the water’s calm, swim near the guards, and read the fine print.

None of this will rescue every bather. The allure of unpatrolled surf — the promise of escape from asphalt, of small freedoms — remains taut as ever. Yet as more city residents seek relief on the sand, the calculus of risk, responsibility, and public investment demands sharper focus.

Beach safety, like many municipal duties, reflects a city’s priorities. New York’s aspiration to cosmopolitan leisure is real, but it must reckon with surging demand and deepening inequality in basic skills. The rip current warning issued last Saturday was soon superseded by another event — a street closure, a subway snag — but the hazards it portended will bob to the surface again, as relentless and unremarkable as the tide. ■

Based on reporting from silive.com; additional analysis and context by Borough Brief.

Stay informed on all the news that matters to New Yorkers.